Agile Software Development Methodologies: A Comparative Analysis

Abstract

Abstract:
Agile software development methodologies have gained a lot of attention in recent years due to their flexible, iterative and collaborative approach to software development. This paper presents a comparative analysis of the most commonly used agile software development methodologies, including Scrum, Extreme Programming (XP), and Kanban. The aim of this study is to provide an in-depth analysis of these methodologies, highlighting their similarities, differences, strengths, and weaknesses.
The research methodology used in this study is a systematic literature review of existing studies and research papers on agile software development methodologies. The analysis of the literature review is then presented in the form of a comparative table, highlighting the key features and characteristics of each methodology.
The findings of this study suggest that all three methodologies have their own unique strengths and weaknesses, and the choice of methodology largely depends on the specific requirements of the project and the team's preferences. Scrum, for instance, is more suitable for large and complex projects with a high level of uncertainty and changing requirements, while Kanban is better suited for projects with a continuous flow of work and a focus on optimizing workflow efficiency. XP, on the other hand, is more suitable for projects with a high degree of technical complexity and the need for continuous testing and integration.
In conclusion, this study provides valuable insights into the similarities and differences of the most commonly used agile software development methodologies. By understanding the key features and characteristics of each methodology, software development teams can make informed decisions about which methodology to use for their specific project needs. The study also highlights the need for further research to explore the effectiveness of these methodologies in different contexts and industries.